Best in class reporting solutions from ERPs: AUDIT SSIS

Thursday, 6 December 2018

Crashing the Load Times using Turbodata

Turbodata-SQL Problem Statement

· Ever increasing data of the end clients

· Serial execution of the queries. If one query fails then the entire process fails. Process has errors. Manual resources required to restart the process.

· Error logging: usage of temporary tables. No intermediate error data available.

· Nightly process-SQL. Client interface in C#/.NET

· The product had to be made scalable. Large number of multiple end users along with audit logs, error logs and data loading. The product to support large number of different kinds of reports-GST, inventory and ledger for the end clients.

· Scalable module with required security is to be developed.

Turbo Data Solution

· Crash the execution time-migrate from SQL to SSIS for load times

· Handle errors separately.

· Bypass the bottleneck processes: store historical data in data warehouse during the fiscal day

· Extensive error mapping, logging systems.

Change in the end client systems:

Business Benefits

Ø Meet the SLA for the management

Ø Reduce execution times: parallel execution

Ø Remove error prone data

Ø Keep error data in staging tables

Ø Restart the process from the place where error occurred: checkpoint and breakpoint

Change in Turbodata-SQL to SSIS

The ETL team adopted the following methodology for converting the sql code to SSIS code:

· Conversion of cte-container

· All the joins-SSIS transforms

· Redirect the error rows for mappings and table inserts

· Drop the indexes before data load and recreate the indexes after data load.

TurboData Conversion Experience

For the linkage of one execute package Task to another, we are using three concepts (Success, Failure, Completion). Hence precedent constraints are marked as ‘completion’ and not ‘successes. The reason for conversion of the same is that the process should run smoothly even if there is an error.

Improved Meta Data Handling

Error history: in the Turbodata initial product, we were not able to track the details of errors at the transform level due to usage of temporary tables. The SSIS team

Validate external metadata is set to false for temporary tables. It should be set to true. Hence the ETL team uses permanent staging tables instead of temporary tables.

Better Error Handling

The ETL team added the breakpoints at container level.

Note *A number of actions possible on breakpoint error such as emailing, inserting details into transaction logs etc.

Error Handling: Dataflow

By some transform error can be generated and we can store error or ignore and fail it. Rows were redirected to ensure smooth dataflow run during the execution process: quicker execution time

Error Handling: Control Flow Level

*Note: Container (At control level): Transaction Option should be Required, So the child component if fail then the whole transaction will be rollback.

The child component of container: The transctionOption should be supported. So that if it fails the all transaction of same container wills rollback.

Error Handling: Control Flow Level

FailParentOnFailure: True (It is applied in case of check point enable) Indicates whether the parent of the executable fail when the executable of child fail.

Rerunning the job from error point:

*The ETL team used the checkpoints to re run the jobs from the places where error had occurred

*Reduce the process re running time

Optimize the Job Run

For job optimization: - On Development side we applied Repeatable and production side applied ReadUncommited.

RunOptimizedMode: True (Applied on Data Flow Task)

Unused columns are not put in the ETL tool buffer (Lower load on the system. Quicker query execution)

Log Settings (Logging Mode enabled at container level and ‘Use Parent Settings’ at dataflow level. Capture execution details at lowest level possible)